Chelsea 2 – 1 West Ham: When will Referee’s be made accountable for their actions?

I haven’t posted something like this in a very long time, however, yesterday’s game brought about so many talking points I felt there was a good basis to write an article.

First off, this article is not purely centered around slandering Anthony Taylor. I thought we were poor, very poor in fact. What annoyed me most about last nights display wasn’t that the result went against us, but that actually, the performance was shocking.

Let’s start with the Line-Up

  1. Antonio at RB: Possibly the biggest question on everyone’s lips since it was introduced late last season. Despite countless protests, Bilic still believes he can turn him into one of the best right backs in the country, and quite simply this is not going to happen. His constant desire to get forward leaves us so wide open at the back and one could argue that this gap caused Ayew’s injury.
  2. Reid over Ogbonna: Personally, I was delighted to see the return of James Collins. We weren’t the same team without him last year, and his constant organisation and dominance in defence are traits that fully deserved to see him return to the side. However, last year, his best games were undoubtedly with Ogbonna, and for me, Ogbonna is by far the superior defender to Reid. Therefore, I was amazed to see him dropped to the bench.
  3. No Feghouli: This of course cannot be helped from a tactical point of view, but we most definitely missed him last night, and I hope he returns to the side soon. I think he has looked by far our best signing so far this window, and like Payet/ Lanzini offers a huge amount of creative threats going forward. Something that we will need to get the best out of our ‘main striker’ Carroll this season.
  4. Starting Enner: I hate to admit sometimes, but I am actually someone who (only on occasions i should add) quite likes Valencia. I like him because he cares. Unlike Sakho, despite a huge amount of media/fan coverage surrounding his future, he has got on with his job and grafted extremely hard for the team, and for that I praise him. There is however, the slight problem that he isn’t actually extremely talented, at all.Which does beg the question, why oh why did Bilic start him? Yes Payet might not have been fit enough, and Feghouli was supposedly injured, but surely pushing Antonio further up the pitch with Ayew, and starting Byram at right back would have been far more beneficial, in both an attacking and defensive sense.

Talking Tactics

1. 4-1-4-1 did not work: Despite many expecting a 4-3-3, it seemed Slav had gone for a 4-1-4-1, with Nordveit sitting just in front of the back four. Unfortunately, this meant that there was no overlapping from the wing backs, and therefore no crosses into the box. It left Carroll so incredibly isolated, leaving the defenders feeling to only option was to boot it up to him. At large majorities of the match it seemed the gameplan was defend, clear it, lose the ball, repeat. Something we haven’t seen since the new England manager was in charge.

2. Ayew injury: There must be a record signing injury curse hanging over West Ham. After the likes of Ashton, Bellamy and the big man himself, I think most would be forgiven for fearing Carroll’s fitness during his first game after an immaculate pre season regime, but definitely not Ayew. I couldn’t help but think how unbelievably typical West ham it was, to see our record signing hobble off after 35minutes. We didn’t see enough of him to get a good idea of what we can expect, however, I have no doubt we missed his creative talents and more importantly his composure on the ball going forward.

3. Nordveit & Tore showed worrying signs: I was very excited to see these two in action, but it’s safe to say it was a night to forget for both. Nordveit had a huge job on his shoulders. I said at the start of the game, I felt Nordveit’s performance would dictate how well the game would go, and it pretty much showed. You can forgive him for feeling the pressure to keep the defence protected from the likes of Willian, Oscar, Kante and Hazard, but he was struggling with the basics. On a number of occasions, he lost the ball through poor simple passes, and as a CDM there was no sign of comfortably carrying the ball once possession had switched. I am sure he will regain composure for Bournemouth, but it was not a great start. Again, we can forgive Tore for being thrown on in the deep end to replace our record signing and make an immediate impact, but he looked lost at times. There was no link up play with Masuaka, and he was sitting so deep, that even when Carroll did win the ball, he was nowhere to be seen to pick it up and make a run. Pressure on his shoulders now with potential injuries to both Ayew and Feghouli.

4. Masuaka/Byram showing very positive signs: Despite it seeming rather negative from an attacking perspective, I thought defensively we looked great, and that was largely down to the two wing backs. Firstly Masuaka, despite no pre season friendly with his new club, he looked very solid at the back, making some very important challenges. I also think he will link up very nicely with Payet once he returns. For now at least, Cresswell’s position looks in safe hands. Secondly Byram. He was absolutely fantastic when brought on, composed both going forward and when coming up against the likes of Hazard, and most importantly, looked confident in his position. It would be fair to say we looked a far better side when he came on, and balance between the defence and attack seemed restored. For me it was a no brainer to bring on Byram for Ayew and push Anotnio up to RW, but Slav obviously had other ideas. Watching Antonio be subbed off for Byram was probably Bilic’s lowest moment as West Ham manager so far. Most importantly, because it looked like he had completely destroyed Antonio’s confidence. I think most fans will hope that was the final nail in the coffin of the ‘Right Back experiment,’ and Byram can establish himself as the first choice, with Antonio pushing further up the pitch and doing what he does best.

5. Fit or not, Payet made a difference: I don’t think anyone was surprised to see Payet left on the bench last night. Despite having a good half hour against Juventus, Bilic wanted to make sure that after an incredible Euro campaign, his star man would enter his second Premier League fully fit. However, it was so clear to see that on the 67th minute when he was subbed on, we changed as a team. The long ball started to disappear, and there were clear sparks of intricate passing all started by the great man himself. I think it would be naive to say his corner set up the goal, as there was a huge scramble before the hero that is Ginger Pele put it in the back of the net, but again, he was making things happen. This leaves me to believe that if we line up next week in a 4-2-3-1 formation with Tore, Payet and Antonio (we can all dream) sitting behind Carroll, we can expect a far more positive impact going forwards.

Injustice once more

I should probably say we should be used to it by now. I can’t count the number of times last season that unfair or incorrect decisions had gone against us. One of course being the dubious decision to award a penalty to Chelsea (Ruben Loftus-Cheek) when it was clearly outside the box. Even Mark Noble said before the game, ‘You don’t forget decisions like that.’ At the start of this season, new laws of the game were laid out for everyone to acknowledge and understand. These included clearer guidelines for awarding a card, but for me the most important was the referee’s ability to award a red card for ‘swearing or abusive language.’ I believe this is a very welcomed rule, as for too long, we have seen players crowd an official and hurl abuse for a decision, regardless of whether it was correct or not. Therefore, it seemed that with this safety blanket rule, referee’s would go into bold decisions without fear or pressure. So step forward tonight’s official Anthony Taylor. In my opinion, Referee’s today are the most protected individual on the pitch every time a Premier league game is played. I don’t mean from an abusive standpoint, but simply in terms of decisions. For example:

Last night, Anthony Taylor made two huge errors.

  1. Not awarding Kante a second yellow: Despite being on a yellow, Kante clattered into Payet flooring him in the middle of the centre circle. I saw tweets last night claiming ‘it’s not a second yellow card offence.’ This is not a thing. Whether it’s a first yellow or a second yellow is irrelevant, the tackle that was made on Payet was a yellow card offence and should have resulted in Kante being sent off.
  2. Not awarding Costa anything?!: ‘It’s late but it’s not reckless’ said the Sky Sports commentator. Well, if this tackle is not ‘reckless’ then I don’t know what is. This tackle is a red card. It’s high, his studs are up and Adrian is very lucky to have not come away with a broken leg. Again, the commentator said, ‘He’s tried to play the ball.’ I have never understood this? Many times i’ve heard the phrase, ‘he tried to play the ball,’ but so?! 99% of tackles see a player ‘trying to play the ball’, but he didn’t he took Adrian’s leg instead. Regardless, it is MINIMUM yellow card offence. Which left the bitter taste of injustice when Diego Costa buried the winner. Don’t get me wrong, it was a fantastic finish, but the truth is he shouldn’t have been on the pitch at all. If someone else had scored, fine. But I can’t help but think that with 9 men, Chelsea would have defended deeply and we would have taken a point. Ugly-Diego-Costa-tackle-on-Adrian.jpg

Now, i’m not going to sit here and write these decisions cost us the game, because quite frankly, we don’t know what would have happened. But it is impossible to say it wouldn’t have drastically changed the attacking mentality of Chelsea. Therefore, my question is, when are referee’s going to be held accountable for their actions? Whether you are a player or manager if you make an error like that on the pitch you are either fined, dropped or sacked. Why is this not the same with our officials. Yes you can argue they have a second to make a decision, but if they aren’t up to it, I am sure there are plenty that are. In a game that has a rulebook as clear as day, why do so many refereeing decisions seem clouded by grey areas of debate and lack of clarity?

A mate of mine who was watching the game yesterday said, “We should introduce the option of post match referee interviews. If they justify their actions backed up with facts or rules then not only does it highlight their ability to do their job, but it will also make other referee’s better.’

I have to say I totally agree with him. I think it would allow referee’s to not only explain their side of events, but also, it gives them an opportunity to hold their hands up and say ‘you know what, I got it wrong.’ Video refereeing (which I personally think is a good idea), will never come to fruition until referee’s admit that they need help. But regardless, it may at least stop fans going away from a game feeling so robbed of a positive result. Especially when we are all paying so much money to follow our teams. I would almost go as far as to say I think it’s fully deserved.

Final Thoughts

I totally agreed with Slav when he came out and said they were the better side, they were. But I was slightly concerned with his insistent tone that we are finished in the transfer market. I personally was very happy with Ayew being our ‘marquee player’ even if he isn’t an ‘out-and-out striker.’ But with his injury looking like a potentially lengthy spell on the sidelines, I don’t see how we can head into the new campaign with only Carroll and the soon to be Hammer Calleri up front. Not only because Calleri is unproven at this level, but also because we are featuring in 4 competitions this season, starting with another European trip this Thursday. I don’t think we can even think about Sakho as he looks so unfazed by playing for us it’s untrue. Despite a lack of confidence from some fans, I think Benteke would be a great addition. I feel it’s unfair to judge him on his time at Liverpool due to being played in a system that doesn’t reflect his strengths. If he can regain his Aston Villa form, he would be a welcomed addition, even if it does mean taking a bit of pressure off Carroll to deliver in all competitions. Only time will tell…

 

Thanks for reading. COYI!

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

One thought on “Chelsea 2 – 1 West Ham: When will Referee’s be made accountable for their actions?

  1. As last night I agree with everything you say, and so we expressed.

    I’ve some concerns about some of the summer signings played last night. So many raved over Masuaka & rated him better than Cresswell, never on last night he seemed avoid of ideas going forward, we had no speed at all on the wings, making those fast crosses into the box?

    Yes we have players to come back & still debut but we must get back to playing as we did last season, I’m not a fan of Carroll’s style of play, but it worries me do we have proven backup for striker.

    Mr Gold indicated last night that is it in the buying market? Well after all the shouting of funds not convinced.

    In Slaven we trust, but why play Antonio at right back, first match yes but we really need to improve on last night

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s